Archive for category Uncategorized

Community Building for Alaska Workshop: October 24-25, 2011

The Alaska Community Foundation & Alaska Pacific University are sponsoring a 2-day workshop in Anchorage focused on community building.

Community building is a field of practices directed toward the creation or enhancement of community among individuals within a regional area (such as a neighborhood) or with a common interest.   Community building includes a wide variety of practices that can be utilized for community building such as potlucks and small book clubs, to larger–scale efforts such as mass festivals and development projects that involve local participants.

Activists engaged in community building efforts in industrialized nations see the apparent loss of community in these societies as a key cause of social disintegration and the emergence of many harmful behaviors. They may see building community as a means to increase social justice, individual well being and reduce negative impacts of otherwise disconnected individuals.

 

 

 

 

The workshop will feature practical skills for those who envision possibility in and provide the skills necessary to mobilize citizens to contribute to an alternative future for their communities.

Click here for the workshop flyer and for more information.

The Mat-Valley Frontiersman Get’s it Right!

Hats off to the Mat Valley Frontiersman Newspaper for accurately reporting on the recent Assembly meeting on September 6th at the Palmer Depot.   Where reporting from other media outlets totally missed the point, the Frontiersman got it right!

A fair interpretation of a volatile topic

If you have a space you want to fill with people, your best bet nowadays is to announce some kind of decision about coal mining.  Tuesday’s borough assembly resolution was not binding in any way on any party. It was really just a piece of advice, the assembly giving its two-cents to state officials tasked with deciding whether to renew Usibelli Coal Mine’s permit to mine at Wishbone Hill between Palmer and Sutton.

If you weren’t at the meeting and just listened to the streaming audio of it online, you would be forgiven for thinking opinion on the matter is evenly split in the borough.

Whether by design or otherwise, the structure of the meeting necessarily left that impression. Attendees were asked to sign up to speak either for or against the mine and Borough Mayor Larry DeVilbiss took turns reading names from each list.

While we could give our opinion of the mine, we haven’t come here today to condemn or endorse it. We’ve come here to talk about what DeVilbiss said was an attempt at fairness.

In our younger days at journalism school we learned that in news reporting we are to give an equal airing to opposing viewpoints. Fairness in reporting requires giving an equal chance for all sides to be heard.

But our professors stressed that an equal chance does not mean an identical amount of news copy. You can give one side a sentence and another a paragraph and still have done justice to both sides.

Indeed, sometimes giving both sides equal space in a story is putting a thumb on the scale. Being fair to the reader means accurately reporting on meetings and events. If one person were to speak against a topic and 20 in favor, the notion of “equal space” would not be an accurate reflection of the meeting or event.

We believe that whether he put it there accidentally or otherwise, DeVilbiss’ thumb was on the scale Tuesday. In giving equal time to both sides he gave the impression that equal numbers showed up on both sides. That was not the case.

For better or worse, those opposed to the mine had a greater representation at Tuesday’s meeting.

That was apparent to anyone who attended and bothered to compare the number of orange anti-coal T-shirts to the number of yellow pro-coal hard hats. Or, to those who stayed long enough to see an informal show of hands in which anti-coal attendees easily outnumbered pro-coal attendees.

Assemblyman Warren Keogh said the number of emails he’d received on the issue was also weighted towards the anti-coal side. The anti-coal emails were more than double the pro-coal ones.

Of course, none of that is scientific. To get those responses require people attend meetings or send emails, and they are really only a gauge of passion. It could well be that many Valley residents favor mining but don’t have the time, inclination or passion to express that opinion publicly.

But knowing which side is more passionate is an important piece of information that DeVilbiss’ attempt at fairness obscured.

 

 

Important Issues To Weigh in on at the Mat-Su Borough Assembly

We would like to inform you about two important issues that are before us at the next Mat-Su Borough Assembly meeting. The Mat-Su Borough Assembly will be making critical decisions at tomorrow on August 16th, related to the Ethics and the Subdivision Codes.  As will all of our work, FoMS is committed to ensuring that you have the information needed and the tools necessary to have an effective voice in shaping a positive future for the borough.

 

The Ethics Issue Again?

As you may recall from one of our recent E-Newsletters, two months ago Ordinance # 11-060 was introduced.  Had it passed, it would have eliminated the all-volunteer Ethics Board and replaced it with one single paid administrative hearing officer who would make decisions on all future ethics issues.  Along with your involvement, we were able to cultivate diverse group of people to write to their Assembly members and show up in person to testify unanimously against the proposed ordinance. This group included business owners, local residents and past and present ethics members to name a few. Despite these efforts, the poorly conceived Ethics Board elimination proposal is still on the table and will be included in Tuesday’s Assembly agenda.

 

An Alternative to Ethics Issue- Ordinance 11-022:

One bright glimmer of hope can be found in the fact that the Assembly will also be considering an alternative proposal (Ordinance 11-022) that includes reforms developed by the Ethics Board that were sent to the Assembly in February. This proposal includes significant updates to the existing laws, a better public process and significant cost savings measures. After this alternative was introduced, the Assembly held a special work session in August to review and make changes to it.   Unfortunately instead of embracing the positive changes put forth by the Ethics Board, the Assembly moved to weaken the proposal by removing the most positive elements that are central to a good public process and government oversight.

 

Examples:

  • Their proposed changes would require that anyone who files an ethics would have to pay a $1,000.00 filing fee.
  • Their proposed changes would make the Ethics Board an advisory only body and instead hand over most of the process to a paid hearing officer much like their earlier proposal to eliminate the Ethics board all together.
  • Ethics Board reform proposals in Ordinance 11-022 are and should be adopted as is.  Any improvements made must be done in a thoughtful way that is respectful of the public process.  Any attempt to weaken the Ethics Board or its process should be firmly rejected.

 

What you can do?

If you are concerned about the pending ethics legislation can write to your Assembly members by clicking here or show up in person on Tuesday August 16th for the special meeting from 4 to 6 p.m and testify at the regular public hearing scheduled for 7 pm.

 

 

The Subdivision Code: Back Up for consideration by the Mat –Su Borough Assembly, Tuesday August 16th

 

WHAT:

The Subdivision Code: Back Up for consideration by the Mat –Su Borough Assembly, Tuesday August 16th

 

Ordinance 11-072

As you will also recall a while back we sent you information related to a proposed roll back in the Subdivision Code.  As you will recall at that time, legislation was introduced by Assembly member Colver to change the current the existing code-Title 27 and roll back the progressive changes that have been developed over the years from the previous version known as Title 16.   Had this legislation been successful it would have resulted in much fewer protections to the individual landowner, increasing threats to water quality and public safety and pass along many costly burdens to the taxpayer from shoddy and unplanned development. It is important to note that the move from the old Title 16 to the current Title 27 was a result of a robust multi-year public process that included input from a wide variety of stakeholders including: developers, engineers, surveyors, agency staff, local business leaders and residents.

 

Your involvement Matters:

Due to your involvement and testimony to the Assembly in July, the legislation to repeal title 27 was shot down by majority vote from the Assembly at that time. As part of this decision the Assembly agreed in that it would be beneficial to provide an opportunity for the Mat Su Borough Planning Commission review Title 27 and make recommendations to the Assembly before making any changes in advance of their August 2nd special work session on the issue. Unfortunately Ordinance 11-072 is still on the table and still up for consideration by the Assembly.

 

Planning Commission Recommendations- An Alternative

It is important to note that the Planning Commission through their review agreed that there was no need to repeal Title 27 and voted unanimously in 7-0 vote to retain Title 27.

The Planning Commission has recently drafted a resolution that is up for consideration at the next Assembly meeting which requests the opportunity to thoroughly review title 27 and make specific recommendations for addressing issues and fixing the current code where appropriate.

 

Main Points:

There is no justification to scrap title 27 and no emergency to make changes to the code at this time.

It is in the best interest of the public process for the Assembly to not rush to a decision during the busiest time of the year given that there is no emergency situation that requires a code change at this time.

Encourage the Assembly to adopt the Planning Commission’s recommendations and resolution to allow for an opportunity to thoroughly review title 27 and make specific recommendations for addressing issues and fixing the current code where appropriate.

 

How you can be involved?

For those who would like to comment about the pending ethics legislation and Title 27 should consider contacting MSB Assembly members or  showing up to testify on Tuesday August 16th at the regular public hearing scheduled for 7 pm.

 

 

 

 

TAKE ACTION: SUBMIT ONLINE COMMENTS WISHBONE HILL AIR PERMIT

Tell DEC to protect our families and property values by denying Usibelli Coal Mine Company’s dangerous air permit application. Take Action Now! Click Here!

 

 

WHAT:

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is considering issuing an air permit to allow the Usibelli Coal Mine company to operate an open pit coal strip mine at Wishbone Hill in the middle of residential communities in the valley.
A copy of the air permit can be found by clicking here.


SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
– DUE MAY 11, 2011.

 

To See a coal blast in slow motion on the Usibelli Website click here. The dust and other air pollutants from this project will impact the entire Matanuska Valley.

 

QUICK FACTS on the air permit can be found by clicking here

 

WHY IT IS IMPORTANT?

Valley property values and the health of our families are at stake. Common sense says that it is unhealthy to live near coalmines. No one in the valley wants dirty coal dust in the air, constant blasting and over 100 coal trucks each day in their neighborhoods and on the Glenn Highway. Property values and public health will suffer if DEC approves this air permit.
Tell DEC to protect our families, public health and property values by denying this air permit for the Usibelli Coal Company’s Wishbone Hill Coal Project.


Your Voice is Needed Today!- Public Comments Due May 11, 2011

TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ONLINE CLICK HERE

 

For more information contact Heather at the Mat-Valley Coalition by email at: mvc@mtaonline.net

 

 

 

Public Meeting: Port Mackenzie Rail Extension Open House

Alaska Railroad (AARC) and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (MSB) are holding a public open house to provide information about the findings in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Mackenzie Rail Extension.  The project connects Port Mackenzie to the mainline of the Alaska Railroad.  Members of the project team will be on hand to present next steps, information on the route, the schedule and answer questions from the public.  To learn more click here

What:  Port Mackenzie Public Open House

When: Thursday, April 7, 2011 6-8PM

Where:

Evangelo’s Restaurant

2530 E. Parks Highway, Wasilla AK.

For more information contact MSB Public Affairs Director, Patty Sullivan at 745-­‐9577; or psullivan@matsugov.us;

Your Voice is Needed For the Future of Palmer

Palmer Depot: Photo Credit-City of Palmer

The City of Palmer Parks, Trails and Recreational Fields Master Plan Public Meeting Notice:

The City of Palmer is planning for the future of Palmer’s parks, trails and recreational fields.    You Thoughts are needed!

If you would like to provide input on the proposed future of the City’s park system, the city of Palmer wants to hear from you. The Community Development Department of the City of Palmer is hosting the first of four public meetings to gain your insight and feedback on the desired outcomes of the City’s Parks, Trails and Recreational Fields Master Plan.

Meeting Details Listed Below:

Meeting # 1:

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

 

Location:

Palmer Depot / Community Center

610 South Valley Way, Palmer, AK

 

Time:

7:00 – 8:30 pm

Anyone who is interested in the City of Palmer’s Parks, Trails and Recreational Fields is urged to attend the upcoming and future meetings.

 

For further information contact Sandra Garley at 761-1322 or email at sgarley@palmerak.org.

 


 

 

Mat-Su Borough Assembly Meeting- Your Voice is Needed!

Biker on Mat RR Trail- Credit Frankie Barker(MSB)

There will be a regular Borough assembly meeting Tuesday, March 15th that will include an important public hearing on trail funding.  Please consider attending to make your voice heard.

The Mat-Su Trails and Parks Foundation (MSTPF) is non-profit organization that has formed to promote a first class trails and parks system for residents and visitors to the Mat-Su Borough.  The MSTPF, is requesting funding from the Mat-Su Borough (MSB) for Trail Management and Public Engagement projects with the provisions to be matched 2 to 1 by other funding sources and volunteer time.

As part of this request, there will be an ordinance and resolution up for consideration by the Assembly to re-appropriate $100k from MSB funds (government) to the Mat-Su Trails and Parks Foundation.

This is a HUGE opportunity for trails in the MSB and that will address some of the current peace meal approaches to resolving trails issues with a more comprehensive approach.  In addition, it will make more funding available for trails, including actual construction and maintenance.

The intent of the agreement is to contract out much of the future trail work to the private sector, thus reducing government involvement and providing cost efficient solutions.  Some of the contracts would most likely include quality-assurance stipulations.

MSB- March 15th Assembly Meeting Update: In addition to the resolution to re-appropritate funds to the MSTPF there will also be a resolution introduced for trail improvements for Hatcher Pass- Resolution Serial No. 11-033: A RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANTS FOR TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE HATCHER PASS SKI TRAILS, FUND.

It can be found on page 6 of the agenda by clicking here:

Your voice is needed!

MSTPF is seeking public support for the ordinance and resolution.  The Assembly needs to hear from all trail users including: motorized, non-motorized, horse, dog, and human-powered users.

Where:

MSB Assembly Chambers

350 E. Dahlia Ave.
Palmer, AK. 99645

When: Public Hearing starts at 7pm.

Sample talking points:

Trails create jobs and business opportunities

Tourism (independent tourists and visitors as well as guided tours)

  • Construction opportunities
  • Materials and equipment for construction
  • Trails attract quality businesses and employees

Trails create strong communities

  • Volunteers working together
  • Places for fundraisers

Trails can improve health

  • Trails provide many benefits for human health

Trail Enhancement Needs

  • With increased number and diversity of users
  • Many existing trails may need to be upgraded
  • Trails need to accommodate full range of uses as well as skill and fitness of users of all ages, including kids and senior citizens
  • Trails need to be distributed throughout borough
  • Users need ready access

If you are unable to make it please consider contacting your Assembly Member by clicking here

For more information on how you can be involved feel free to contact Jeremiah at the Friends of Mat-Su office: (907) 746-0142

Mat-Su Borough Public Meeting Schedule

For a complete listing of  upcoming Mat-Su Borough meetings
Click here

Save the Date-Friends of Mat-Su Annual Meeting March 4th

Save the Date-Friends of Mat-Su Annual Meeting March 4th
Celebrating 12 Years of Working Together to Build Healthy and Vibrant Communities


Your are invited to Join Friends of Mat-Su for our Annual Spring Meeting on March 4th, at the Agate Inn in Wasilla.  Please bring along all of your friends and neighbors to celebrate our past accomplishments and help us chart the course for a productive future.


When:
Friday, March 4, 6-9PM

What: Friends of Mat-Su -Annual Meeting

Where: Agate Inn 4724 Begich Circle, Wasilla, AK

Meeting Highlights

  • Participate in an interactive panel exploring planning activities throughout the Borough
  • Meet our new Executive Director
  • Meet our current board members
  • Elect new board members
  • Help us focus our  future work
  • Connect with your community

Enjoy delicious Foods, Drinks  and good Friends


Update on The Susitna River Hydro Project

On November 24, 2010 the Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority/Alaska Energy Authority press release announced their recommendation that the Low Watana site on the Susitna River should be the primary hydroelectric project for the Railbelt in order to fulfill the Alaska legislative mandate of  50% renewable energy sources by 2025 and in order to meet future energy needs.  Accompanying the press release was a Prelimninary Decision Document that recommends filing a Preliminary Permit with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by 12/31/11 in order to start the federal licensing process.  (Complete information can be found here- Railbelt Large Hydro)  The 2010 Alaska Legislature appropriated $10 million for AEA to study possible railbelt hydro projects.

The proposed Susitna Dam project, called the Low Watana Non-Expandable, would be a 700 foot high dam with a 600MW powerhouse and located at Mile 184 of the Susitna River, 15 miles upstream of Devil’s Canyon and fifty miles from Talkeetna.

The current proposed cost is $4.5 billion; and without state financing participation, the project wouldn’t happen.  What is currently being considered is the Bradley Lake Hydro Model which is that the State would pay for the licensing and most of the project cost, and the railbelt utilities would purchase all the power and pay the bond financing, operations and maintenance costs.

Access would be via the Denali Highway, 21 miles of it would have to be upgraded to construction grade road year round, a 40 mile new road then to the site, and a possible new Alaska Railroad line from Gold Creek to the site.  Upgrades to the existing North/South intertie transmission line would be necessary which may include constructing a parallel new transmission line (according to the Railbelt Regional Integrated Resource Plan, February, 2010).

Fisheries certainly would be detrimentally impacted by changes in water quality, water temperature, suspended sedimentation, reservoir draw down fluctuations, flow regimes, habitat, and impoundment zone inundation.

River flow projections would be peak summer flows reduced, high late summer flows, and winter flows would be increased to generate more power.  Temperatures would be cooler in the spring and early summer and warmer in the fall and winter.

Regarding earthquake risk, the Castle Mountain Fault is located 65 miles away, the Denali Fault is located 45 miles away, and the inter-plate subduction zone is located 40 miles away.

Note:  There will be several public meetings and opportunities to comment on the project for those who are interested. The meetings are as follows:

Upcoming Public Meeting Schedule:

Thu. February 24, 2011 Fairbanks

5:00 p.m. Open House, 6:00 p.m. Presentation
Princess Riverside Lodge, 4477 Pikes Landing Road

Mon. February 28, 2011  Talkeetna

5:00 p.m. Open House, 5:30 p.m. Presentation

Talkeetna Elementary School Gym, 13930 East Timberwolf Loop

Tue. March 1, 2011  Palmer

5:00 p.m. Open House, 6:00 p.m. Presentation

Palmer Community Center (Depot), 610 South Valley Way

Wed. March 2, 2011  Anchorage

5:00 p.m. Open House, 6:00 p.m. Presentation

Dena’ina Center, Tyonek Room 2nd Floor, 600 West 7th Avenue

Tue. March 15, 2011  Kenai

5:30 p.m. Open House, 6:00 p.m. Presentation

Challenger Learning Center, 9711 Kenai Spur Highway

Information: To Read the Alaska Energy Report on Large Scale Hydro click here

To contact or communicate with AEA:

Email: largehydro@aidea.org

Susitna Project Manager is Bryan Carey at 771-3065, 888-300-8543

813 W. Northern Lights Blvd, Anchorage AK 99503-2495

Note: For a list of  potential questions visit the Alaska Center for the Environment Climate and Energy Page